Joined
·
13,181 Posts
If you had an M9 Beretta and wanted a .22 understudy, would you rather buy the Ciener conversion for $200, or pop the $300 for the Chiappa dedicated clone/lookalike?
My kid bought himself an M9 just before he left for USAF flight training, and I'm thinking of getting him one or the other as his graduation present.
The $300 whole gun looks at first like a no-brainer, but we have no experience with Chiappa and their durability, service, parts, etc.
OTOH, we have four Ciener units between us (1911 and P35) and they work great. Beretta parts for the bottom half should be available for years, and with more than 25K rounds through one of my units (maybe two of them), I have good faith in the Ciener's reliability and longevity. And of course, the converted M9 will have exactly the same grip feel and trigger pull.
Any other thoughts that would sway the debate one way or the other?
My kid bought himself an M9 just before he left for USAF flight training, and I'm thinking of getting him one or the other as his graduation present.
The $300 whole gun looks at first like a no-brainer, but we have no experience with Chiappa and their durability, service, parts, etc.
OTOH, we have four Ciener units between us (1911 and P35) and they work great. Beretta parts for the bottom half should be available for years, and with more than 25K rounds through one of my units (maybe two of them), I have good faith in the Ciener's reliability and longevity. And of course, the converted M9 will have exactly the same grip feel and trigger pull.
Any other thoughts that would sway the debate one way or the other?