Gun Hub Forums banner
1 - 2 of 2 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
346 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I need some information on bullet seating and crimping.
Here's the situation.
I am currently making two different cartridges in .38 special for Cowboy Action Shooting. One has a 96 grain bullet that has no grooves in it.
The other has a 125 grain bullet with two grooves. In the 125 gr, starting from the front, the second groove is much deeper that the first.
I load these bullets to the same depth and my die automatically crimps the bullets. In the 125 gr, the crimp is in the first groove. Since there is no groove in the 96 gr, it just folds in.
Both cartridges fire well. I use the 96 gr in my revolvers, but I sometimes have trouble chambering the 125 gr in my rifle. I am told that if I use .357 in the rifle, I will not have troubles.
I would rather set up my press and just keep everything the same, just trading bullets. My powder charge and everything else is exactly the same for both cartridges.
Can I make the rifle bullets longer by not seating them so deeply? If so, does this create a problem with crimping the rifle bullet where there is no crimp groove or can I use the second, deeper groove? I think if I use the second groove, it will be so far up that the 96 gr bullet will not be in deep enough to crimp. My concern in the rifle is, by not crimpiing at a groove, when I load 10 rounds, will this push the bullet back in the cartridge, creating high pressure?
I know the BEST way to load is to buy another complete tool head set up and use one for .38 and the other for .357, but this is a bit expensive. I am looking for the second best way.
I have another option in going to a 158 gr bullet which should be longer, but then I think I would have the same problem with the 96 gr bullet. I would rather not do that because I found such a good deal on the 125 gr that I bought 8,000 of them and I have to use those up before I change out.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
346 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Pussycat Loads??
Moi? :wink:
Compared to tactical loads, I guess they are, but about average for Cowboy shooting.
Your assumption is correct on the rifles. My wife and I both shoot Marlin 1894s. Hers has had a .38 special carrier installed while mine shoots either .38 or .357. Hers works fine with either my loads or longer factory loads. Mine usually works OK. I will get a cockeyed cartridge that I have to just shake out and load another round on the clock. That kills my time. This will happen on at least 2 stages each day. I don't know if I am short stroking the lever or if it is just one of those things. I tried to convince my friends that I just go faster than the mechanism can keep up with. (No one bought that.)
I thought that if I could get 1/4 inch more in lenth, that might solve the problem. Again the main concern is bullets sliding back into the case when loading into a magazine.
I don't think there is any lubricant on the bullet at all. They are supposed to be moly coated to help eliminate leading. They are slippery as all get out. Seems to work OK, but I always run some jacketed ammo through anyway just to clean out the rifling. Whatever, leading is not a problem and might not have been anyway. The rifles actually stay pretty clean.
I am using 3.2 grs of Titegroup. If I crimp at the second deeper groove, will I have to use more powder? Except to maintain accuracy, velocity is not an issue. I know several people who use lighter loads of the same powder with no problem, but they crimp at the first groove. I certainly don't mind using more powder if needed, but how do you tell? The cost of more powser is not a major issue as this powder is very economical to begin with. The only reason I would not want to change is that this particular combination shoots very well in both rifle and pistol.
 
1 - 2 of 2 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top