Okay, now that I've gotten back up off the floor (You really shouldn't do that to me, Walt) I gotta admit I like the way you think.
I'm no constitutional scholar, but I can read english. The wording of the 2nd ammendment, to me, seems to unequivocably suppport your contention. Unfortunately, the Supremes have allowed how the states can restrict the possession of firearms "reasonably".
This act has a chance, albeit a small one, if it can be attached to a larger, "more important" piece of legislation. You know, through the back door.