Gun Hub Forums banner
1 - 14 of 14 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
2,627 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I saw these on the Wilson Combat website, and discussed by Larry Vickers and Ken Hackathorn on a video on Vicker's site where they were singing their praises.

Anyone have any experience with these? Do they offer any real advantages?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,627 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Kinda my thoughts. While I have no doubt they work, I just wondered if they possibly offered any real advantage.

They tout 'smoother operation" and a "significantly" longer life. Which may or not be true.

But I don't shoot as much as say, a professional competitor, who goes through tens of thousands of rounds a year.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
7,059 Posts
I have a couple of guns that I shot for a whole bunch of years of bullseye competion that still have the springs I put in them in the 60s. They're still just fine.

I have often said that the people who recommend changing springs often are those who sell springs.

That is for normal full size 1911s but not mini or micro imitations
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5,681 Posts
Generally speaking a spring will lose about 2% of it's weight in the first 30 days. Over the next year it will lose about another 2% and then stay there pretty much forever.

This "spring set" is why I greatly prefer to work with a revolver's existing springs rather than installing new springs. You are much more assured that what you do to the gun will never change.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,627 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
I tried a set of Wolff springs on a J frame once. The gun was new and trigger pull was pretty stiff. Didn't really like the feel and put the factory springs back in.

After a time, the little gun seemed to smooth out and "lighten" up.

That spring set thing explains it.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
387 Posts
I have often said that the people who recommend changing springs often are those who sell springs.
Much like the people recommending National health care reform...:grumble:
 

· Registered
Joined
·
387 Posts
Good info guys...I recently sold my Colt 90 Double Eagle Officers model and was thinking about another "compact" 45...I'm rethinking it
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,627 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
Good info guys...I recently sold my Colt 90 Double Eagle Officers model and was thinking about another "compact" 45...I'm rethinking it
I really like the Commander sized 1911's. I have an old 1991 Officer's Model, which started out as being pretty reliable. It didn't stay that way long, and even changing the recoil spring and different magazines didn't fix it. Could never really diagnose the problem, so it just sits in my safe. I won't trade or sell a handgun made for defensive carry that is fatally flawed. Luckily, it has only happened to me once.

The Commander sized guns I've had have all run well. Springfield, Kimber and Colt. The lightweight Colt Commander is now my daily duty and off duty gun, it carries so well.

The gun manufacturers seem to sell a whole lot of the Officer's size (3" bbl's) so folks like them. They might have solved all of the inherent problems in making the guns with such short slides and fast cycling times work well in the last 10 years or so. I just don't have any personal experience with them.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
387 Posts
I'm sure the "Turks" will be producing or should I say re-producing one soon. The Girsan is a fine shooting 1911 for the price. Seems like their tolerances are good as well.
Certainly worth the risk if the price stays right. IMVHO
 
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top