Gun Hub Forums banner

1 - 4 of 4 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
795 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
From Forbes of all places. New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism
NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth's atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
3,882 Posts
to ALL,

remember the "drowning polar bears" story that supported "global warming" & the HYSTERICAL whining, wailing & tears that the study caused among GULLIBLE "animal friendly" people?

fwiw, the AUTHOR of that same "peer-reviewed scientific study" is jailed for falsifying the data in the study!

i HAD to LOL when that was reported on Channel 60 this AM!

yours, sw
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
795 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
I thought Forbes would do a better job of vetting their content. Does NASA Data Show Global Warming Lost in Space?
Andrew Dessler, a professor of atmospheric sciences at Texas A&M University, called Spencer a "controversial figure" within the climate research community. He argued that Spencer's paper is neither new nor correct.

"He's taken an incorrect model, he's tweaked it to match observations, but the conclusions you get from that are not correct," Dessler told LiveScience.com.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
795 Posts
Discussion Starter #4
Oppose the warmists, and they will enact punishment upon you.

The Warmists Strike Back
Dr. Roy Spencer from the University of Alabama Huntsville recently published a paper along with his colleague Dr. Dan Braswell that made quite a splash in the media; their research found that the IPCC and other global warming researchers had underestimated the amount of heat being reflected back into space. UAH is the principle research establishment that collects and analyzes satellite data, and an analysis of data from NASA's Terra satellite showed that more energy was being reflected into space than was previously thought. They published their findings -- which use the standard models employed by the IPCC and others -- as their starting point, showing why those models are wrong. Their paper (see here) appeared in the journal Remote Sensing.
Read the entire post. It's a good study of how the peer review process is being subverted and how the global warming mafia punishes researchers and editors who stray from the party line.
 
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
Top