Gun Hub Forums banner
1 - 15 of 15 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
2,274 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Well, so much for goodwill from that deal they made some years ago.

My main question is, how are anti-gunners, who do not buy guns, supposed to boycott a gunmaker?

Of course, the other one is, if something is restricted in one place, how does that make it restricted everywhere? Philadelphia, PA has a strict soda tax, but if I sell soda in Dubuque, that doesn't matter.

https://www.pluralist.com/posts/191...unless-they-cough-up-5-million/partners/44450
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
13,181 Posts
Well, so much for goodwill from that deal they made some years ago.
With leftists, there is no such thing as a compromise or final deal. Whatever is negotiated just becomes the baseline from which they immediately launch a new push toward their final goal; repeat as necessary.

How many times have you heard "It's a good first step" whenever any new gun law is enacted? Thousands, I'll bet. We're now on Gun Control Step #87 or thereabouts, and yet everything is always only "a good first step."
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
13,181 Posts
Who, besides me, we part of the "S&W must die," brigade because of the "deal"?
About the time that happened, they stopped making anything I'd want to own, so it never really affected me much one way or the other.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,949 Posts
Who, besides me, was part of the "S&W must die," brigade because of the "deal"?
I was. And when the British holding company that owned them when the deal was struck sold them to an American interest at a loss, I was satisfied.

The people involved had lost their jobs; the owners had lost money and the company.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
7,059 Posts
I've debated whether or not I should even comment but I was right in the middle of that whole mess. I had very close ties to S&W at the time and caught a lot of flak when I wrote my column defending S&W.

The president of S&W took all the blame although I can't help but think that their British owners were somewhere in the background.

In any case the president told me it was his decision. I told him he did not understand the market or their customers very well and the public outcry was totally predicable.

Today I have no connections there and everyone I knew has either retired or been fired. It's a very different company now.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
10,462 Posts
I told him he did not understand the market or their customers very well and the public outcry was totally predicable.

<snip>

It's a very different company now.
While the management as well as ownership has changed, they still make revolvers with those damned holes in the frame for a "Key" to lock/unlock the piece. The only thing truly needed is a brain and keeping your finger off the trigger if you don't intend to fire. When I buy an S&W I buy an old model.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
10,462 Posts
I blundered and sold my 1929 Colt DS to a friend and retired SA cop.:(

I'm tempted to see if he'll sell it back for a reasonable profit.
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
13,181 Posts
Last new S&W revolvers I bought were a 3" M66 around 1989, and a 4" M17 (which was available for a short while after they discontinued the M18 .22 Combat Masterpiece) in the early '90s.

Couple years back I was able to score an older M28 6" to replace (finally) the one I had to sell out of poverty in 1980. I think I'm pretty much Smithed up now. ;)
 
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top