Joined
·
10,462 Posts
Transcript of Trump's Ukraine Call
1 - 20 of 33 Posts
Joined
·
13,181 Posts
I hear that Trump is planning to name Nasty Piglosi an honorary co-chairman of his re-election campaign. :neer:
Piglosi: "Blah blah blah inquiry of impeachment."
Trump: "Meep-meep!"
I'm beginning to think that the real purpose of the "impeachment inquiry" is to take out not Trump, but Biden.
Piglosi: "Blah blah blah inquiry of impeachment."
Trump: "Meep-meep!"
I'm beginning to think that the real purpose of the "impeachment inquiry" is to take out not Trump, but Biden.
Joined
·
3,920 Posts
Yep, until they take a vote, there is no impeachment, just the rope-a-dope.
And they have AOC to play the dope.
As soon as that vote happens a lot of Dems in red states are going to be looking at early retirement.
And they have AOC to play the dope.
As soon as that vote happens a lot of Dems in red states are going to be looking at early retirement.
Joined
·
7,286 Posts
WaltGraham,
As much as I dislike "Nanny" Pelosi, I have to admit that she's at least smart enough to KNOW that any actual impeachment of DJT will DESTROY any chance that the DIMocRATS have to keep their majority in the HoR.
That said, I also consider her to be one of the "enemies domestic" that we GIs took a solemn oath to protect the Constitution from.
(At least in my case, I was NEVER released from that oath.= I's bet that many GIs here feel the same & see themselves as bound by the oath that they took until released "by proper authority".)
NOTE: I have an old & dear friend who is Principal Chief of the White Mountain Apache Nation & who believes that NONE of us, who freely took that oath, can be released from its requirements for our Earthly life. - I suspect that the Chief is 100% correct.
yours, sw
As much as I dislike "Nanny" Pelosi, I have to admit that she's at least smart enough to KNOW that any actual impeachment of DJT will DESTROY any chance that the DIMocRATS have to keep their majority in the HoR.
That said, I also consider her to be one of the "enemies domestic" that we GIs took a solemn oath to protect the Constitution from.
(At least in my case, I was NEVER released from that oath.= I's bet that many GIs here feel the same & see themselves as bound by the oath that they took until released "by proper authority".)
NOTE: I have an old & dear friend who is Principal Chief of the White Mountain Apache Nation & who believes that NONE of us, who freely took that oath, can be released from its requirements for our Earthly life. - I suspect that the Chief is 100% correct.
yours, sw
Joined
·
2,134 Posts
Hopefully a lot of Dems in purple states, what few are left, too. Be nice if the Red Tide even spreads further into Blue Turf too...
Joined
·
7,286 Posts
bearcat6; All,
What bothers me about the TRUMP-HATING LEFT is that I fear that when he is re-elected, as he WILL be, that we will have BLOOD of many innocents RUNNING in the streets.
Here in Texas, the CRAZIES state that they plan terrorist acts that "will make people forget 9-11" in AUSTIN, DALLAS, EL PASO, HOUSTON & SAN ANTONIO first.
(I monitor the NUTS' websites.)
ImVho, BEST PREPARE to defend your loved ones, home & hearth. = IF I'm 100% wrong (and I hope that I'm wrong.), little is lost by being prepared BUT if I'm correct, it will be too late for making plans for self-defense in the city.
(As for our house, we have invested in better locks, intrusion alarms, a LOUD watchdog, a family emergency plan that is practiced & our guns are available/loaded. = We will NOT seek out trouble but will be ready, should trouble come looking for us.)
Just our opinions, D & sw
What bothers me about the TRUMP-HATING LEFT is that I fear that when he is re-elected, as he WILL be, that we will have BLOOD of many innocents RUNNING in the streets.
Here in Texas, the CRAZIES state that they plan terrorist acts that "will make people forget 9-11" in AUSTIN, DALLAS, EL PASO, HOUSTON & SAN ANTONIO first.
(I monitor the NUTS' websites.)
ImVho, BEST PREPARE to defend your loved ones, home & hearth. = IF I'm 100% wrong (and I hope that I'm wrong.), little is lost by being prepared BUT if I'm correct, it will be too late for making plans for self-defense in the city.
(As for our house, we have invested in better locks, intrusion alarms, a LOUD watchdog, a family emergency plan that is practiced & our guns are available/loaded. = We will NOT seek out trouble but will be ready, should trouble come looking for us.)
Just our opinions, D & sw
Joined
·
1,257 Posts
This is like the movie stars who threaten to move to Canada if a Republican gets elected....... still waiting and hoping.
Remember that the soyboys talk a good game....when they're hiding behind an anonymous social media site.
When it gets face to face, suddenly they forgot to let the cat out or turn off the oven.
At worse you'd see Antifa style riots inside big Lefty cities like Seattle.
Out in fly over (gun owner) country... not so much.
Like the 60's the true violent radicals would start bombing courthouse bathrooms, robbing big city banks to finance themselves, and shooting it out with the police.
This time they won't have the KGB funneling money to them, and escaping to Cuba isn't just a hijacked airplane away anymore.
Where most of us live we'll see nothing.
Remember that the soyboys talk a good game....when they're hiding behind an anonymous social media site.
When it gets face to face, suddenly they forgot to let the cat out or turn off the oven.
At worse you'd see Antifa style riots inside big Lefty cities like Seattle.
Out in fly over (gun owner) country... not so much.
Like the 60's the true violent radicals would start bombing courthouse bathrooms, robbing big city banks to finance themselves, and shooting it out with the police.
This time they won't have the KGB funneling money to them, and escaping to Cuba isn't just a hijacked airplane away anymore.
Where most of us live we'll see nothing.
Joined
·
2,134 Posts
Ah, but now they have Soros and Steyer, and several other megaleft Mercedes Marxist billionaires to play sugar-daddy, who are at least as good at hiding their money movement if not better.
True, escaping to a Workers' Paradise or other non-extradition country afterward isn't as easy, and there are very few that are Unto Death True Believers... but trust me, a brainwashed Millennial who's made up hisherits mind that hesheit has nothing left to lose is a damn scary thing.
True, escaping to a Workers' Paradise or other non-extradition country afterward isn't as easy, and there are very few that are Unto Death True Believers... but trust me, a brainwashed Millennial who's made up hisherits mind that hesheit has nothing left to lose is a damn scary thing.
Joined
·
13,181 Posts
I see I'm not the only one to notice the similarity:Piglosi: "Blah blah blah inquiry of impeachment."
Trump: "Meep-meep!"
https://patriotpost.us/cartoons/27814
Joined
·
3,920 Posts
Yep, they've got Trump right where they want him.
This time.
I'm sure of it...
This time.
I'm sure of it...
Joined
·
2,546 Posts
You mean Washington, Oregon and Kalifornistan aren't accepting asylum seekers?
True believers of any stripe can be scary. Fortunately, there's frequently a high klutz component there, at least where they aren't subjected to Darwinian selection.
About the hearings, you could read Mother Goose in that arena and the Left would come out screaming in outrage.
Joined
·
1,257 Posts
Soros and Steyr are far too smart to funnel money to actual terrorist.
If Antifa were declared a terrorist group or started bombings, they'd drop them like a red hot cannonball.
These days money is too easy to follow, witness the defunding of al Qaeda by the Bush administration.
They followed the money, emptied bank accounts, took out the money handlers, and starved al Qaeda of the funding they needed.
There's a whopping difference between a billionaire Lefty legally putting out seed money and a KGB "diplomat" slipping a few hundred thousand in the country in a diplomatic pouch.
One of the untold stories of the 60's radial anti-war crowd was that the KGB resident at the San Francisco consulate was delivering money to people like Jane Fonda, who he was also screwing.
This was discussed in a book written by a Navy SEAL who had started up a training operation using Fonda as a target.
They found out her involvement with the KGB resident and the money transfers.
The operation got out of hand and the SEAL's in the training exercise actually began the targeting phase for real until a more senior officer learned it was going active and shut it down.
Again, the Lefties aren't totally stupid.
They're not going to get violent anywhere except where Lefty cities will tolerate it because they know that in "fly over" country the police and citizens won't allow it.
You're not going to see Antifa stopping cars and threatening people in a Right to carry area.
It's a lot of fun and makes you feel real big and powerful for you and a mob of your friends to threaten someone in an anti-gun area.
Not so much in an area were people carry and there's a good risk some tiny little woman might pull out a 9mm and send you to The Promised Land.
Robert Heinlein said it best..."Never threaten a little man. You'll frighten him and he'll kill you".
If Antifa were declared a terrorist group or started bombings, they'd drop them like a red hot cannonball.
These days money is too easy to follow, witness the defunding of al Qaeda by the Bush administration.
They followed the money, emptied bank accounts, took out the money handlers, and starved al Qaeda of the funding they needed.
There's a whopping difference between a billionaire Lefty legally putting out seed money and a KGB "diplomat" slipping a few hundred thousand in the country in a diplomatic pouch.
One of the untold stories of the 60's radial anti-war crowd was that the KGB resident at the San Francisco consulate was delivering money to people like Jane Fonda, who he was also screwing.
This was discussed in a book written by a Navy SEAL who had started up a training operation using Fonda as a target.
They found out her involvement with the KGB resident and the money transfers.
The operation got out of hand and the SEAL's in the training exercise actually began the targeting phase for real until a more senior officer learned it was going active and shut it down.
Again, the Lefties aren't totally stupid.
They're not going to get violent anywhere except where Lefty cities will tolerate it because they know that in "fly over" country the police and citizens won't allow it.
You're not going to see Antifa stopping cars and threatening people in a Right to carry area.
It's a lot of fun and makes you feel real big and powerful for you and a mob of your friends to threaten someone in an anti-gun area.
Not so much in an area were people carry and there's a good risk some tiny little woman might pull out a 9mm and send you to The Promised Land.
Robert Heinlein said it best..."Never threaten a little man. You'll frighten him and he'll kill you".
Joined
·
1,491 Posts
The timing needs to be queried I mean Bolton out then this?Thought's out there say Bolton was played by Trump to see were he would lead them he was DS(Bolton) all along.It has been said the report has been on Shiffty's desk since early August only to hit the streets 6 weeks later? Russia 2.0 America will get tired of this crap
SA tactic:The seventh rule: A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Man can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time, after which it becomes a ritualistic commitment, like going to church on Sunday mornings.
SA tactic:The seventh rule: A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Man can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time, after which it becomes a ritualistic commitment, like going to church on Sunday mornings.
Joined
·
1,491 Posts
CrowdStrike
the plot is deep whether Dim/Pug DC needs a bath.Coincidence??
Seth Rich was killed on July 10th, 2016. The next day, CrowdStrike, an FBI contractor and IT company, received a check for $98,849.84 from the Democratic National Committee (DNC).
Rich worked for the Democratic National Committee (DNC). It is unknown whether Rich leaked his employer's emails.
Shawn Lucas was killed on Aug. 2nd, 2016. The next day, CrowdStrike received a check for $113,645.77 from the DNC.
Lucas delivered a law suit to DNC headquarters for a local court. The suit alleged the Democratic Party committed fraud by rigging their primary election in favor of Hillary Clinton.
The source of the checks is the Federal Election Commission (FEC)…….
https://brassballs.blog/home/are-ch...rs-of-seth-rich-and-shawn-lucas-question-mark
the plot is deep whether Dim/Pug DC needs a bath.Coincidence??
Seth Rich was killed on July 10th, 2016. The next day, CrowdStrike, an FBI contractor and IT company, received a check for $98,849.84 from the Democratic National Committee (DNC).
Rich worked for the Democratic National Committee (DNC). It is unknown whether Rich leaked his employer's emails.
Shawn Lucas was killed on Aug. 2nd, 2016. The next day, CrowdStrike received a check for $113,645.77 from the DNC.
Lucas delivered a law suit to DNC headquarters for a local court. The suit alleged the Democratic Party committed fraud by rigging their primary election in favor of Hillary Clinton.
The source of the checks is the Federal Election Commission (FEC)…….
https://brassballs.blog/home/are-ch...rs-of-seth-rich-and-shawn-lucas-question-mark
Joined
·
1,257 Posts
In late news, it's being reported that Adam Schiff had the transcript of the Trump-Ukraine call a month ago and sat on it until the "right" moment, just like Diane Finestein sat on the charges about Justice Kavenaugh until they could do the most damage.
Also, the CIA recently secretly changed the rules on whistleblowers so hear-say could be used.
The stench from the Dims and the Washington swamp is overpowering.
It appears that unelected, unaccountable people in the intelligence agencies, the Justice Department, and the FBI have decided that THEY will be running the country from now on.
What's needed is for a new president to assign a vice-president to the sole task of cleaning out the house, by firing or transferring people to Butte Montana or Alaska.
There's a lot of screaming from the career bureaucrats about Trump having the Department of Agriculture moved out of Washington to Ohio.
If an agency like the Forestry Service is concerned with big woods and logging, they should be located where the big woods and logging are.
How about a small town (pop. 5,000 or so) in Montana or Oregon.
It would be great for the small town, and the bureaucrats would be close to their "customers".
Also the lobbyist would have to follow and stay in a tiny town with no fine bars with a great wine list.
Also, the CIA recently secretly changed the rules on whistleblowers so hear-say could be used.
The stench from the Dims and the Washington swamp is overpowering.
It appears that unelected, unaccountable people in the intelligence agencies, the Justice Department, and the FBI have decided that THEY will be running the country from now on.
What's needed is for a new president to assign a vice-president to the sole task of cleaning out the house, by firing or transferring people to Butte Montana or Alaska.
There's a lot of screaming from the career bureaucrats about Trump having the Department of Agriculture moved out of Washington to Ohio.
If an agency like the Forestry Service is concerned with big woods and logging, they should be located where the big woods and logging are.
How about a small town (pop. 5,000 or so) in Montana or Oregon.
It would be great for the small town, and the bureaucrats would be close to their "customers".
Also the lobbyist would have to follow and stay in a tiny town with no fine bars with a great wine list.
Joined
·
10,462 Posts
Joined
·
3,920 Posts
That's good, Top.
My take: It isn't so much anger, or contempt. The whole power structure in several major agencies, news outlets and a certain political party are scared. Scared of something massive.
They abandoned the gun issue for this with almost no transition. I am thinking that Biden blabbed something big. Either payola, or, as you mentioned, something to do with how the DNC was "Hacked."
In the Wikileaks case, I have always wondered about this. The "Talking heads" in the Media and the Democratic Party said that it was a "Hack." Well, this wasn't Wikileaks' Modus Operandi in either of their two previous high profile leak cases.
In the Bradley/Chelsea Manning case with the Army and the Edward Snowden case in the NSA, they got people inside. They turned people and had them work as moles, either using their access or pushing to access stuff a bit beyond their clearance, and then passing the data out physically. Flash drives, that sort of thing. That isn't "Hacking, in the sense of some guy, or gal, in a hoodie sitting in a basement somewhere with 20 big screens doing a "Matrix" style waterfall thing. It's good, old school, reliable use of Moles.
So, I always figured, where would Wikileaks suddenly get all this hacking help from the Russians, never mind going to that whole length of trying a new tactic, with the increased chances of someone twigging to it and them getting caught? Why not just do what they had always done? Why not just try to use a mole, when they had been so successful in cultivating them in Government Agencies, which were not only more known for secrecy protocols than campaigns, but had actual on the books no-joke penalties they could use to deter a would-be Mole? Why not just try to cultivate a mole? If I think of the most likely way that I would have gone about getting into the Democratic National Committee's files, as Wikileaks in 2015 or 2016, I would pick the way that had proven most successful before.
I have always found the idea that Wikileaks did just that to be a very hard idea for me to shake.
A lot of people are scared of something, something big. Something they don't seem to be chancing a year's wait on. After all, we keep hearing that the issues of guns and other social matters are winners, and that people are ready to reject Trump at the polls. Why go this hard?
On the part of the Media, I can only surmise: Let's say that some of the most highly placed folks "In the chain" knew that they had reported something bogus, knowingly, like the "Russia hack" thing. What would they be willing to do to try and prevent that information from becoming public?
Again, this is all what-if. It does make me think, though. Someone seems scared of something big. Javlin, you might be on to something.
There is something potentially bigger out there, something I have also considered for a while. Not sure if I should post it here, because it gets pretty far into the weeds of "Conspiracy theory" territory.
They abandoned the gun issue for this with almost no transition. I am thinking that Biden blabbed something big. Either payola, or, as you mentioned, something to do with how the DNC was "Hacked."
In the Wikileaks case, I have always wondered about this. The "Talking heads" in the Media and the Democratic Party said that it was a "Hack." Well, this wasn't Wikileaks' Modus Operandi in either of their two previous high profile leak cases.
In the Bradley/Chelsea Manning case with the Army and the Edward Snowden case in the NSA, they got people inside. They turned people and had them work as moles, either using their access or pushing to access stuff a bit beyond their clearance, and then passing the data out physically. Flash drives, that sort of thing. That isn't "Hacking, in the sense of some guy, or gal, in a hoodie sitting in a basement somewhere with 20 big screens doing a "Matrix" style waterfall thing. It's good, old school, reliable use of Moles.
So, I always figured, where would Wikileaks suddenly get all this hacking help from the Russians, never mind going to that whole length of trying a new tactic, with the increased chances of someone twigging to it and them getting caught? Why not just do what they had always done? Why not just try to use a mole, when they had been so successful in cultivating them in Government Agencies, which were not only more known for secrecy protocols than campaigns, but had actual on the books no-joke penalties they could use to deter a would-be Mole? Why not just try to cultivate a mole? If I think of the most likely way that I would have gone about getting into the Democratic National Committee's files, as Wikileaks in 2015 or 2016, I would pick the way that had proven most successful before.
I have always found the idea that Wikileaks did just that to be a very hard idea for me to shake.
A lot of people are scared of something, something big. Something they don't seem to be chancing a year's wait on. After all, we keep hearing that the issues of guns and other social matters are winners, and that people are ready to reject Trump at the polls. Why go this hard?
On the part of the Media, I can only surmise: Let's say that some of the most highly placed folks "In the chain" knew that they had reported something bogus, knowingly, like the "Russia hack" thing. What would they be willing to do to try and prevent that information from becoming public?
Again, this is all what-if. It does make me think, though. Someone seems scared of something big. Javlin, you might be on to something.
There is something potentially bigger out there, something I have also considered for a while. Not sure if I should post it here, because it gets pretty far into the weeds of "Conspiracy theory" territory.
Joined
·
2,134 Posts
Well, as long as you caveat that you're only spitballing a what-if and not saying you'd go to Vegas and put your chips on it you should be fine.
Besides, it's a safe bet that the history books have seen weirder play out... "The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is constrained by limits of plausibility."
Besides, it's a safe bet that the history books have seen weirder play out... "The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is constrained by limits of plausibility."
1 - 20 of 33 Posts
