Joined
·
2,546 Posts
I've long been pondering the misuse of the term "Progressive" in current political areas. At least misuse with respect to TR and fellow travelers. It seem dead on if one accepts it as the term of art 1950-1970 for those formerly labled "agrarian reformers".
Given the attempted resurrection of Hillary, we need a snappy more pointed label for those of similar political bent.
"Neofeudalist" isn't going to work, despite it being true. She does see herself as royalty and the rest of us as serfs. "Neocom" is too close to neocon. Any suggestions?
Given the attempted resurrection of Hillary, we need a snappy more pointed label for those of similar political bent.
"Neofeudalist" isn't going to work, despite it being true. She does see herself as royalty and the rest of us as serfs. "Neocom" is too close to neocon. Any suggestions?