Joined
·
120 Posts
What's the worst-case situation that you have envisioned encountering as a concealed weapon carrier? (And by "envisioned encountering" I don't mean that it's something you are paranoid about, just something that you've recognized as being a possibility, no matter how slight, at some point.)
For me it would be the mass-shooting nightmare, such as happened in a McDonalds in California in 1984 or a Luby's in Texas in the early 1990s. And now I guess I'd have to add Mumbai-style terror attacks to the list, since law enforcement experts seem to think that these types of atrocities will be attempted at some point here in the U.S.
I don't live in fear of these worst-case scenarios, but the very slight possibility of encountering one of these mass-shooting situations has always made me more apt to carry the biggest and most effective gun that I can effectively conceal, and to devote a portion of my practice to distances beyond 25 yards. As great as they are for their intended purpose, I don't believe a gun like a KelTec P32 or Ruger LCP would be much help if I ever had to defend myself or loved ones from a spree-killer popping away from across a large restaurant dining area. I realize that escape could potentially be the best option in a situation such as this, but I have been in many restaurants where one could be completely cut off from any exit, making escape impossible, and still face an antagonist from beyond 25 yards. Given a choice, I would prefer to carry a weapon that gives me a realistic chance of hitting a goblin at these distances, chambered for a caliber capable of putting said goblin down with a minimal number of hits. Does this level of armament guarantee that I would prevail in any such encounter, or be successful in putting the goblin down? Of course not, but it does give my skills a fighting chance.
What's your worst-case concealed carry scenario?
For me it would be the mass-shooting nightmare, such as happened in a McDonalds in California in 1984 or a Luby's in Texas in the early 1990s. And now I guess I'd have to add Mumbai-style terror attacks to the list, since law enforcement experts seem to think that these types of atrocities will be attempted at some point here in the U.S.
I don't live in fear of these worst-case scenarios, but the very slight possibility of encountering one of these mass-shooting situations has always made me more apt to carry the biggest and most effective gun that I can effectively conceal, and to devote a portion of my practice to distances beyond 25 yards. As great as they are for their intended purpose, I don't believe a gun like a KelTec P32 or Ruger LCP would be much help if I ever had to defend myself or loved ones from a spree-killer popping away from across a large restaurant dining area. I realize that escape could potentially be the best option in a situation such as this, but I have been in many restaurants where one could be completely cut off from any exit, making escape impossible, and still face an antagonist from beyond 25 yards. Given a choice, I would prefer to carry a weapon that gives me a realistic chance of hitting a goblin at these distances, chambered for a caliber capable of putting said goblin down with a minimal number of hits. Does this level of armament guarantee that I would prevail in any such encounter, or be successful in putting the goblin down? Of course not, but it does give my skills a fighting chance.
What's your worst-case concealed carry scenario?